STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. DIVISION OF BEVERAGE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
HARRY LEE MORRIS, JR. ET AL., APPELLEES

Fla. 2d DCA | 1980-10-17
No. 80-561
HOBSON and RYDER, JJ., concur.
389 So. 2d 315 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The State of Florida appealed the dismissal of its petition to forfeit a vehicle used to transport untaxed cigarettes. The court held that untaxed cigarettes constitute contraband under Florida's Uniform Contraband Transportation Act, making vehicles used to transport them subject to forfeiture.


Holding

Untaxed cigarettes constitute contraband under Section 943.41(2)(c), and vehicles used to transport them are subject to forfeiture. The word 'solid' in the statute functions as a noun, not an adjective, and the Legislature intended to include untaxed cigarettes in the definition of contraband.


Headnotes

[1] Vehicles used to transport untaxed cigarettes are subject to forfeiture under the Florida Uniform Contraband Transportation Act.

[2] The word "solid" in the definition of contraband under Section 943.41(2)(c), Florida Statutes, is a noun, not an adjective modifying "equipment."

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the cigarettes are clearly not equipment, liquid or solid”

The trial court's reasoning for dismissing the forfeiture petition, which the appellate court found erroneous

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Harry Lee Morris, Jr. used a motor vehicle to transport more than fifty cartons of untaxed cigarettes in violation of Florida's cigarette tax law. The…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SCHEB, Chief Judge.

SCHEB, Chief Judge.

The state appeals the dismissal of its petition for forfeiture of a motor vehicle.

The petition for forfeiture alleged that Harry Lee Morris, Jr., had used the vehicle to transport more than fifty cartons of untaxed cigarettes in violation of Section 210.-18(1), Florida Statutes (1979). The State sought forfeiture under Section 943.41(2)(c), Florida Statutes (1979), of the Florida Uniform Contraband Transportation Act. This subsection includes “[a]ny equipment, liquid or solid, which is being used or intended to be used in violation of the beverage or tobacco laws of the state” in its definition of contraband. At the hearing Morris moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that cigarettes are not contraband items under Section 943.41(2)(c). The trial court agreed and granted the motion, stating “the cigarettes are clearly not equipment, liquid or solid.”

The state contends that the word solid as used in Subsection (2)(c) is a noun and not an adjective modifying equipment. We agree. Although the Cigarette Tax Law, Chapter 210, Florida Statutes (1979), does not provide for the forfeiture of vehicles used in transporting unstamped packages of cigarettes, the title of Chapter 74-385, Laws of Florida, enacting the Florida Uniform Contraband Transportation Act, provides “for seizure and forfeiture of vehicles illegally transporting or delivering ... tobacco.” Thus, we conclude, as did the attorney general, that the Legislature intended to include untaxed cigarettes in the definition of contraband under Section 943.-41(2)(c).1 1976 Op.Atty.Gen. Fla. 076-43 (February 23, 1976). Therefore, since vehicles used in transporting untaxed cigarettes are subject to forfeiture, the trial court erred in granting Morris’ motion to dismiss.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

HOBSON and RYDER, JJ., concur. . While it occurred after this case, we note that the Legislature has amended the definition of contraband in Subsection 943.41(2) to include “[a]ny personal property including, but not limited to, any item, object, tool, substance, device, weapon, machine, vehicle of any kind, money, securities, or currency, which has been or is actually employed as an instrumentality in the commission of, or in aiding or abetting the commission of, any felony.” Ch. 80-68, § 1, Laws of Fla.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Seymour Hecker v. State, 355 So. 2d 168 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
    …PER CURIAM. Reversed on authority of State v. Zawistowski, 389 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). REVERSED. CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., and WEAVER, SIDNEY M., Associate Judge, concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw