DONALD HENRY RIPLEY, JAMES ROBERT RIPLEY, LAWRENCE FITZGERALD RIPLEY, SUZANNE RIPLEY KRANC AND JOHN NOEL RIPLEY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, ETC., APPELLANTS,
v.
CHARLES F. SIMPSON, APPELLEE
DONALD HENRY RIPLEY, JAMES ROBERT RIPLEY, LAWRENCE FITZGERALD RIPLEY, SUZANNE RIPLEY KRANC AND JOHN NOEL RIPLEY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES, ETC., APPELLANTS,
CHARLES F. SIMPSON, APPELLEE
389 So. 2d 7
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court concerning this land dispute is based on substantial competent evidence and inferences which may justifiably be drawn from that evidence. There are conflicts in the evidence, and inferences which may have sustained a judgment for appellants, but we will not substitute our view of the evidence for that of the trial judge.
AFFIRMED.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
City OF Melbourne & Am. Druggists Ins. Co. v. Floyd, 415 So. 2d 758 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…ch a motion does not fall within Rule 9.020(g), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure and does not toll the rendition date of the original order. Hofer v. Gil de Rubio, 409 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982); Alimenta (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Pender Peanut Co., 389 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Gordon v. Barley, 383 So. 2d 322 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The Petition for Writ of Certiorari is DISMISSED. COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.…