JAMES G. DEDAKIS, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA REAL ESTATE COMMISSION, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1980-09-15
No. NN-411
MILLS, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.
388 So. 2d 22 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida Real Estate Commission required an appellant with an inactive real estate license to pay the annual Real Estate Recovery Fund fee in addition to the regular license fee. The First District Court of Appeal affirmed the Commission's decision, holding that the plain language of Florida Statutes § 475.482 applies to both active and inactive licenses and does not require formal rulemaking to implement.


Holding

The Commission's requirement is valid and does not constitute an unadopted rule. The plain language of Florida Statutes § 475.482 applies to all "licenses" without distinguishing between active and inactive status, and the statutory purpose supports requiring contributions from inactive licensees who retain the right to reactivate their licenses at any time.


Headnotes

[1] An agency's interpretation of a statute does not require formal rule adoption if the statutory language is plain and unambiguous.

[2] The Florida Real Estate Recovery Fund fee applies to both active and inactive real estate licenses, as the statute makes no distinction between the two.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“The statute refers to "licenses" for brokers and for salesmen, and makes no distinction between active and inactive licenses.”

Establishes the court's textual analysis that the statute's plain language applies equally to all licenses regardless of status

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

James G. DeDAKIS held a real estate license in inactive status. The Florida Real Estate Commission, through letters from its Executive Director C. P. …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
BOOTH, Judge.

BOOTH, Judge.

This cause is before us on appeal from agency action dismissing a petition to have a rule declared invalid. The petition alleges that letters of C. P. Stafford, Executive Director of the Florida Real Estate Commission, to appellant state what is in effect an agency rule which has not been adopted and is, therefore, invalid. These letters state that the provisions of Florida Statutes § 475.482, Real Estate Recovery Fund, apply to those whose licenses have been placed in inactive status as well as to those having active status. On this basis, the Commission had required that petitioner, whose license is on inactive status, pay the annual $3.50 fund fee in addition to the regular license fee.

We find that the Commission has followed the statute and that the matter does not require adoption of a rule. The statute refers to “licenses” for brokers and for salesmen, and makes no distinction between active and inactive licenses.1 Nor does the stated purpose of the fund lead to the conclusion that there should be no contribution by holders of inactive licenses. Such licensees may choose to return to active status at any time. They have an interest in maintaining their profession and the public’s estimate thereof in the interim. Contribution to the Real Estate Recovery Fund aids these objectives. Thus, the plain wording of the statute, its stated objective and the Commission’s practice in applying the statute are in accord. Adoption of a rule under these circumstances is unnecessary.

Accordingly, the order below is affirmed.

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur. . Florida Statutes § 475.482, in part:

475.482 Real Estate Recovery Fund-There is created the Florida Real Estate Recovery Fund as a separate account in the Professional Regulation Trust Fund.

(1) The Florida Real Estate Recovery Fund shall be disbursed as provided in s. 475.484, on order of the board, as reimbursement to any person or corporation who is adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to have suffered monetary damages by reason of any of the following acts committed as a part of transaction involving the sale of real property in this state by any broker or salesman who was licensed under the provisions of this chapter at the time the alleged act was committed:

(2) A fee of $3.50 per annum shall be added to the license fee for both new licenses and renewals of licenses for brokers, and a fee of $1.50 per annum shall be added for new licenses and renewals of licenses for salesmen. This fee shall be in addition to the regular license fee and shall be deposited in or transferred to the Real Estate Recovery Fund.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Bennett v. Berk, 400 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
    …91 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966); Perez, II v. City of Miami, 358 So. 2d 1132 (Fla.3d DCA 1978). An insurance broker may be liable for damages where there is an agreement to procure insurance and a negligent failure to do so. Marlor v. Foley Carter Ins. Co., 388 So. 2d 22 (Fla.2d DCA 1980); Cat ’n Fiddle, Inc. v. Century Insurance Company, 200 So. 2d 208 (Fla.3d DCA 1967), vacated in part on other grounds, 213 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1968). It is uncontested that the insurer communicated to brokers Kane and Beck that the f…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw