ALEXANDER L. GREEN, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE.

Fla. 3d DCA | 2019-04-03
No. 3D18-2239
Before EMAS, C.J., and SALTER and FERNANDEZ, JJ.
271 So. 3d 144 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (2019)


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Connolly v. State, 172 So.3d 893, 903-04 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015) (holding that "technical defects in a charging document are treated differently than the failure to allege an essential element of the crime. An indictment that wholly omits an essential element of a crime is a fundamental defect that may be raised at any time because the indictment fails to charge a crime when an essential element is omitted. Use or possession of a firearm, however, is not an essential element of second degree murder, but rather, it may serve to allow for a reclassification of the second degree murder from a first degree felony to a life felony or as an enhancement of the sentence imposed") (internal footnote and citation omitted). See also Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla. 2007) (holding that an Apprendi/ Blakely 1 error is subject to a harmless error analysis); Robinson v. State, 215 So.3d 1262, 1274 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw