THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
SIDNEY KATES, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court suspended attorney Sidney Kates from practice for three months and one day, followed by a requirement to demonstrate rehabilitation, for professional misconduct including neglect of a probate client and improper handling of trust funds.
Kates is suspended from the practice of law for three months and one day, effective immediately, and thereafter until he presents proof of rehabilitation demonstrating he has the facilities, ability, and inclination to provide quality legal services. The court agreed with the referee's findings that Kates violated multiple disciplinary rules.
[1] An attorney's neglect in advising and assisting a client in probating an estate, leading to the client's removal as personal representative and loss of fee, constitutes a…
[2] An attorney's commingling of client funds with personal funds and failure to maintain proper trust account records violate professional responsibility rules.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Mrs. Bressler was inexperienced in legal affairs and totally dependent upon Kates to protect her interests in this matter. Due to Kates' neglect in advising and assisting Mrs. Bressler, she failed to perform her duties as executrix, resulting in her removal as personal representative and the loss of her fee for administering the estate.”
Establishes the factual basis for finding neglect and violation of professional responsibility duties owed to a vulnerable client
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMrs. Mary Bressler hired Kates in September 1975 to probate her deceased husband's estate. Kates neglected to properly advise and assist Bressler, res…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Bar Code Of Professional Responsibility cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar against Sidney Kates, a member of The Florida Bar, is before us on complaint of The Florida Bar and report of the referee. No petition for review has been filed. Jurisdiction vests in this Court pursuant to article V, section 15, of the Florida Constitution.
The referee found that Mrs. Mary Bressler hired Kates in September of 1975 to probate the simple and uncluttered estate of her deceased husband. Mrs. Bres-sler was inexperienced in legal affairs and totally dependent upon Kates to protect her interests in this matter. Due to Kates’ neglect in advising and assisting Mrs. Bres-sler, she failed to perform her duties as executrix, resulting in her removal as personal representative and the loss of her fee for administering the estate. This neglect constituted a violation of Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Rules 6-101(A)(3) and 7-101(A)(2) and (3).
Moreover, the referee found that Kates failed to properly account for trust moneys by improperly commingling with his own funds $74.50 that Mrs. Bressler had provided for costs. Failure to keep trust account records also caused Kates to collect the $5.00 fee for the state certificate declaring the estate nontaxable from both Mrs. Bressler and the successor personal representative. These acts were in violation of Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, rule 11.02(4), and Florida Bar Code of Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Rule 9-102(B)(3).
The referee recommended that Kates be found guilty of misconduct and suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months and one day and thereafter until he shall present proof of rehabilitation by showing that he has the facilities, ability, and inclination to supply his clients with quality legal services. Kates has previously been found guilty of professional misconduct 1 which resulted in a ninety-day suspension beginning June 30, 1978.
We have reviewed the record and agree with the referee’s findings and recommendation of guilt. Accordingly, Sidney Kates is hereby suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, for a period of three months and one day and thereafter until he shall present proof of rehabilitation as described above. Costs are hereby as sessed against Kates in the amount of $530.99.
It is so ordered.
ADKINS, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur. . The Florida Bar v. Kates, 360 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 1978). In that case, Kates agreed to represent a client in a small claims court action, yet failed to attend the pretrial or trial. The client prevailed without Kates.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Hotaling, 360 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 1978)
- THE Florida BAR v. Kates, 360 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 1978)