ALTAMESE JACKSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1980-08-13
No. 79-669/T4-464
DAUKSCH, C. J., and ORFINGER and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur.
386 So. 2d 570 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Topics
Withdrawal Of Counsel Right To Counsel

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Withdrawal Of Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order withholding adjudication of guilt and placing appellant on probation entered by the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida. The Notice of Appeal states it is an appeal from the sentence. The Public Defender has filed an Anders1 motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. This court gave the appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief on his own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is hereby granted and the sentence is hereby

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, C. J., and ORFINGER and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Schwartz v. Schwartz, 396 So. 2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
    …a thirty-per cent interest in the vacation home be awarded to the wife. See, e. g., Canakaris, supra, Ro-sen v. Rosen, 386 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). See also McCall v. McCall, 386 So. 2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980) and Collinsworth v. Collinsworth, 386 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). We reach the opposite conclusion with respect to the $300,000 cash payment. Rosen v. Rosen, supra. Like Rosen, supra, the husband’s assets were willed or given to him by his family and neither earned by him nor contributed to b…
  • Smith v. Smith, 428 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
    …he fact that a final judgment uses the term “special equity” when the record does not establish a vested property right does not invalidate the award if it can be upheld on alternative grounds, such as lump sum alimony. Collinsworth v. Collinsworth, 386 So. 2d 570 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). As was stated in Canakaris: The judge possesses broad discretionary authority to do equity between the parties and has available various remedies to accomplish this purpose, including lump sum alimony, permanent periodic alimon…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw