JACOB E. MOSNAT ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
SUN FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ORLANDO ET AL., APPELLEES
JACOB E. MOSNAT ET AL., APPELLANTS,
SUN FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ORLANDO ET AL., APPELLEES
382 So. 2d 1312
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See In re Smith Estate, 75 So. 2d 686 (Fla.1954); Rowland v. Miller, 81 Fla. 408, 88 So. 263 (1921); 35 Fla.Jur., Wills, § 271. See generally Chapter 737, Florida Statutes (1977) and Annot., 62 A.L. R.2d 1412 (1957).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Se. Fire Ins. Co. v. Lehrman, 443 So. 2d 408 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)…in the policy is ambiguous or otherwise susceptible of more than [*409] one meaning. Absent such factors courts should apply the plain meaning of words and phrases used in a policy of insurance. Guthrie v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 382 So. 2d 1312 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). While we will not hesitate to construe provisions against an insurance company responsible for drafting the contract, we must be equally ihindful to construe words and phrases according to their plain meanings. This is especiall…
Authorities Cited
- Rowland v. Albert F. Miller De Bonis Non Cum Testamento Annexo of the Estate of Eugene B. Rowland, 81 Fla. 408 (Fla. 1921)
- In re the Tr. Est. of Winfred L. Smith, 75 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 1954)