THE FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
THOMPSON AIRCRAFT TIRE CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES
THE FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY, APPELLANT,
THOMPSON AIRCRAFT TIRE CORPORATION ET AL., APPELLEES
382 So. 2d 878
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The final summary judgment under review is affirmed upon a holding that the entry of said judgment, although contrary to our mandate in Firestone Tire and Rubber Co. v. Thompson Aircraft Tire Corp., 353 So. 2d 137 (Fla.3d DCA 1977), is compelled by the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Houdaille Industries, Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So. 2d 490 (Fla.1979), which was rendered subsequent to, and supercedes our prior Firestone decision in this cause.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Coudry v. City OF Titusville, 438 So. 2d 197 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…nk of Tampa v. Pappas, 372 So. 2d 989 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Dorset House Ass’n, Inc. v. Dorset, Inc., 371 So. 2d 541 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Thompson Aircraft Tire Corp., 353 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977), appeal añer remand 382 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Schurkman v. Stolar, 347 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Forte v. Tripp & Skrip, 339 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976); Keyes Co. v. Executive Center, Inc., 311 So. 2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Watier v. REW Crane Service, Inc., 240 So.…
-
Edward M. Chadbourne, Inc. v. Algie F. Vaughn, 491 So. 2d 551 (Fla. 1986)…ation in evaluating any comparative negligence involved. Because the majority opinion would deny the plaintiff a proper resolution of these issues without the trial to which he is entitled under these circumstances, Martinez v. Clark Equipment Co., 382 So. 2d 878 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Clement v. Rousselle Corp., 372 So. 2d 1156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. dented, 383 So. 2d 1191 (Fla.1980), I must dissent. I would remand with instructions to remand for a trial on the merits. SHAW, J., concurs.…
-
Hyster Co. v. Stephens, 560 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…sign defect in this case was the cause of Stephens’ injuries, and whether any owner or operator negligence contributing to the accident was foreseeable. Cassisi v. Maytag Co., 396 So. 2d 1140 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Martinez v. Clark Equipment Company, 382 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Next, Hyster argues that counsel for the Stephens made improper and prejudicial remarks in final argument which require reversal. However, we find that only Hyster’s complaint about opposing counsel’s “cover-up” argument merits…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Houdaille Indus., Inc. v. Edwards, 374 So. 2d 490 (Fla. 1979)
- The Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Thompson Aircraft Tire Corp., 353 So. 2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)