JOHN BENTON, PETITIONER,
v.
THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT AND THE HONORABLE CHARLES MINER ET AL., RESPONDENTS

Fla. 1st DCA | 1980-03-31
No. TT-303
MILLS, C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH, J., concur.
382 So. 2d 753 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases

Opinion of the Court
WENTWORTH, Judge.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

This cause is before us upon petition for a writ of prohibition. Petitioner has not demonstrated that he is without other adequate means of redress for the alleged wrong about to be inflicted by the trial court, Prohibition will not lie to usurp the functions of an appeal. State v. Trammell, 192 So. 175 (Fla.1939); Corbin v. State, 324 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Accordingly, the petition is denied.

MILLS, C. J., and LARRY G. SMITH, J., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Sutton v. State, 975 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 2008)
    …appeal.” Sparkman v. McClure, 498 So. 2d 892, 895 (Fla.1986) (citing State ex rel. Turner v. Earle, 295 So. 2d 609 (Fla.1974); State ex rel. Schwarz v. Heffernan, 142 Fla. 137, 194 So. 313 (1940); Benton v. Circuit Court for Second Judicial Circuit, 382 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)). Furthermore, notwithstanding that prohibition is generally available only to prevent courts from acting when there is no jurisdiction to act (rather than to prevent an erroneous exercise of jurisdiction), see Goldman, 502 So.…
  • Sparkman v. McCLURE, 498 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 1986)
    …to a writ of prohibition where he has an adequate remedy via appeal. State ex rel. Turner v. Earle, 295 So. 2d 609 (Fla.1974); State ex rel. Schwarz v. Heffeman, 142 Fla. 137, 194 So. 313 (1940); Benton v. Circuit Court for Second Judicial Circuit, 382 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Therefore, because Sparkman seeks to prevent a pros [*896] ecution that has already taken place and because Sparkman has an adequate remedy by way of the conviction appeal presently pending before the circuit court, the district…
  • In the Interest of J.C.B. v. State, 512 So. 2d 1073 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)
    …, if the charging document sufficiently alleges the value of the property taken as exceeding $100, then the crime of second degree grand theft becomes a lesser included offense by virtue of the allegations in the pleadings. [*1075] McCants v. State, 382 So. 2d 753 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The value of the property allegedly taken is an important element of any charge of grand theft, whether of the first or second degree and whether it is the principal crime charged or is a lesser included offense. The theft stat…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw