ELIZABETH E. MENZ, APPELLANT,
v.
IN RE THE ESTATE OF CLIFFORD M. MENZ, DECEASED, APPELLEE
ELIZABETH E. MENZ, APPELLANT,
IN RE THE ESTATE OF CLIFFORD M. MENZ, DECEASED, APPELLEE
381 So. 2d 375
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The Order Determining Elective Share is hereby affirmed, except for its failure to award an attorney’s fee to the widow. The personal representative had a duty to file a petition for and to pay the elective share in the case at bar. Rule 5.360, Rules of Probate and Guardianship (1979). The failure to do so necessitated the employment of counsel by the widow, and the attorney’s efforts on the widow’s behalf resulted in a change in the distribution of the will. See In Re Estate of Freedman, 340 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., BOOTH and SHAW, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The Fla. Bar. in re Rules of Probate & Guardianship Procedure, 531 So. 2d 1261 (Fla. 1988)…elevant facts. The committee offers no opinion on whether a personal representative may have a duty to oppose the entitlement to the elective share based on the existence of an apparently valid marital agreement. The case of Menz v. Estate of Menz, 381 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), provides for attorney’s fees to be awarded to surviving spouse if the personal representative fails to file a petition to determine the amount of the elective share. If the optional procedure in paragraph (a) is utilized, the fi…
-
Tillman v. Smith, 526 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)…h the decedent’s actual intent and; 3) her actions fulfilled the duties of the personal representative by petitioning for and obtaining the elective share. In support of her position, the surviving spouse relies primarily on Menz v. Estate of Menz, 381 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980), In re Estate of Freedman, 340 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1977)2 and Johnson v. Burleson, 61 So. 2d 170 (Fla.1952). The opinion in Menz v. Estate of Menz provides in its entirety as follows: PER CURIAM. The Order Determining Ele…
-
Smail v. Hutchins, 491 So. 2d 301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…standing to file the petition to enforce Luta’s right to an elective share. See §§ 733.612(20), 46.021, Fla.Stat. (1985). In addition, appellee owed Luta a duty to file the petition to determine the elective share. See Menz v. In re Estate of Menz, 381 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); see also Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.360(a) (“If the surviving spouse files an election for elective share, the personal representative shall file a petition to determine the amount of the elective share....”) (emphasis added). Since Luta…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- In re Est. of Harry Freedman, 340 So. 2d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977)