IN THE INTEREST OF E.J.G., A CHILD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Right To Counsel On Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an adjudication of delinquency and commitment to the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services entered by the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida. The public defender has filed an Anders 1 motion and brief, requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this Court that no reversible error appears. On October 26,1979, this Court gave the appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in her own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The Court has reviewed the brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the public defender to withdraw is hereby granted, and the adjudication of delinquency is hereby
AFFIRMED.
COBB, UPCHURCH and SHARP, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Vazquez, 419 So. 2d 1088 (Fla. 1982)…McDONALD, Justice. The state petitions for review of Vazquez v. State, 405 So. 2d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), on the basis of conflict with Dedmon v. State, 400 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), and Orr v. State, 380 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). We have jurisdiction1 and approve in part and quash in part the instant district court opinion. [*1090] A three-count indictment charged Vazquez with first-degree murder, unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, an…1 / 2
-
Thames v. State, 454 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)…ez, supra, at the time of appellant’s trial. We note, however, that there did exist at that time a split of authority as to whether a defendant was entitled to severance of a count charging possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Orr v. State, 380 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). The weight of authority throughout the country held that severance was required. See, Vazquez v. State, 405 So. 2d 177, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981), aff'd, State v. Vazquez, supra. In light of this split of authority and the obvious…
-
Sosa v. State, 639 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…uld have been granted. The offenses in the instant case should have been separated for trial where one charge required proof of a previous felony conviction and one did not. See id.; Maycock v. State, 398 So. 2d 495 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Orr v. State, 380 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). Even if consolidation of charges is the most practical and efficient method of processing a case, practicality and efficiency should not outweigh a defendant’s right to a fair trial. Vazquez, 419 So. 2d at 1091; Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.…
Previewing 3 of 9 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)