FLORIDA COLLEGE AND AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, APPELLANTS,

v.

ARLIN WILSHER AND MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Leisure v. State, 429 So. 2d 434 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
  …eason of events occurring since the entry of the plea, it has been prejudiced in now being able to prove its case. Pittman v. State, 382 So. 2d 1227 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); see also Gainey v. State, 386 So. 2d 904 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), and Gray v. State, 379 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Finally, we note that our holding in this case does not conflict with our previous decisions in Alexander v. State, 399 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), Puccio v. State, 424 So. 2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (on petition for rehearin…
• Gray v. State, 381 So. 2d 302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)
  …. State, 364 So. 2d 450 (Fla.1978). We temporarily relinquished jurisdiction of the case to the trial court for a determination of whether the ruling on appellant’s motion to suppress the tangible evidence was dispositive of the case. Gray v. State, 379 So. 2d 435 (Fla.2d DCA 1980).1 This court has now been duly notified of the trial court’s determination that its ruling on the motion to suppress tangible evidence standing alone is not disposi-tive of the case. Accordingly, on the authority of Brown v. State…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Carr v. State, 421 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)
  …PER CURIAM. The trial court having concluded that its order on motion to compel was not disposi-tive of the case, the appeal is dismissed. Pursuant to the procedure suggested in Gray v. State, 379 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980), the trial court shall allow appellant thirty days from the date of this order within which to file a motion to withdraw her plea. The trial court shall grant such motion unless the state is able to establish prejudice as a result…

Authorities Cited

• Emerson Crews v. Town OF BAY Harbor Islands & Metro. Dade Cnty. Self Ins. Fund, 378 So. 2d 1265 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)