CHARLES F. EATON AND E. MELBA EATON, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, MARGARET S. FRICK, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, O. T. FRICK, THOMAS W. AUSTIN AND RUTH V. AUSTIN, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE,
v.
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
CHARLES F. EATON AND E. MELBA EATON, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, MARGARET S. FRICK, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, O. T. FRICK, THOMAS W. AUSTIN AND RUTH V. AUSTIN, AS HUSBAND AND WIFE,
CITY OF FORT LAUDERDALE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF FLORIDA
159 Fla. 99
Florida Supreme Court (1947)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 31 So. 2d 64
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
Affirmed on authority of City of Hollywood v. Davis, et al., 154 Fla. 785, 19 So. (2nd) 111.
THOMAS, C. J., TERRELL and CHAPMAN, JJ., and WILLIAMS, Associate Justice, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Food Mach. Corp. v. Ferguson, 159 Fla. 133 (Fla. 1947)
-
Food Mach. Corp. v. Ambrose J. Cook, 159 Fla. 133 (Fla. 1947)
-
Jewel Arlene Pittman v. Pittman, 159 Fla. 556 (Fla. 1947)
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- THE City OF Hollywood v. Davis, 154 Fla. 785 (Fla. 1944)