CHRISSIE I. CLAWSON, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, C. C. CLAWSON, APPELLANT,
v.
WILLARD R. BLACK, AND THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG, A CORPORATION, AND A. M. ANDERSON, AS RECEIVER OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG, APPELLEES
CHRISSIE I. CLAWSON, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, C. C. CLAWSON, APPELLANT,
WILLARD R. BLACK, AND THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG, A CORPORATION, AND A. M. ANDERSON, AS RECEIVER OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ST. PETERSBURG, APPELLEES
102 Fla. 1071
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 137 So. 675
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
— -This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is therefore, considered, *1072ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.
Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Leonard v. Leonard, 259 So. 2d 529 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972)…blanket denial was insufficient in face of the presented evidence of adultery. McMillan v. McMillan, supra (162 So. at 526); Benson v. Benson, supra (102 So. 2d at 751); Patterson v. Patterson, supra (177 So. 2d at 255, footnote 2); Heath v. Heath, 102 Fla. 1071, 138 So. 796, 797. For the reasons assigned, the award of alimony was improper in this case. Malby v. Malby, 142 Fla. 656, 195 So. 601; Patterson v. Patterson, supra. Accordingly, that part of the judgment which provided for payment of alimony by t…