ASC MEAT IMPORTS, LTD., PETITIONER,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, BOARD OF REVIEW AND LYNN A. CALDWELL, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• City OF Coral Springs v. Broward Cnty., 387 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)
  …right to rely. Greenhut Construction Company, Inc. v. Henry A. Knott, Inc., 247 So. 2d 517 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). The doctrine of equitable estoppel may be invoked against a municipality in the same manner as an individual. Enderby v. City of Sunrise, 376 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). In Enderby, supra, we stated: There is no question that the doctrine of equitable estoppel may be invoked against a municipality as if it were an individual. Hollywood Beach Hotel Co. v. City of Hollywood, 329 So. 2d 10 (Fla.…
• Corp. de Gestion Ste-Foy, Inc. v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 385 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …port the goods in question for less. The Brandon case reflects the general rule that the equitable doctrine of estoppel cannot be employed to effect results which are unlawful or otherwise contrary to public policy. E.g., Enderby v. City of Sunrise, 376 So. 2d 444 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); United Sanitation Services of Hillsborough, Inc. v. City of Tampa, 302 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974). Applying these principles to the precise situation involved in this case, three well-reasoned decisions from other jurisdicti…
• City OF Fort Lauderdale v. Canary Enters., Inc., 546 So. 2d 1114 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …ufficient to include advertising balloons. Although similar requests for permits were mistakenly issued in the past, the city is at present properly issuing permits under a reasonable interpretation of the city code. See Enderby v. City of Sunrise, 376 So. 2d 444, 445 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979) (quoting Miami Shores Village v. Wm. N. Brockway Post, 156 Fla. 673, 24 So. 2d 33 (1945)). Appellees correctly point out that “[t]he granting or withholding of a permit to engage in a legitimate business should not depend on…