CLERK OF THE COURTS, PETITIONER,
v.
DEBORAH J. (NAPIER) ARWOOD, RESPONDENT

Fla. 1st DCA | 1979-10-18
No. NN-256
MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.
376 So. 2d 410 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We have considered at length the petition for common law certiorari which was revived, after denial, by our grant of rehearing. Considering the state of the record, the issue briefed by petitioner, and the limitation on our review powers by common law certiorari, we conclude that the circuit court did not depart from the essential requirements of law. The petition for certiorari, accordingly, is

DENIED.

MILLS, C. J., and ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr. and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …1.470(b), Fla.R.Civ.P. Counsel for plaintiff cannot now claim error in the special interrogatory verdict submitted to and answered by the jury, because same was prepared by counsel for the plaintiff and any error thereby was induced. Walker v. Senn, 376 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Behar v. Southeast Banks Trust Company, N.A., 374 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Public Health Trust of Dade County v. O’Neal, 348 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). There is no error in defense counsel referring to admissions made…
  • Motyczka v. Allstate Ins. Co. & Victor Stephen, 647 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Bould v. Touchette, 349 So. 2d 1181, 1186 (Fla.1977); Walker v. Senn, 376 So. 2d 410, 411-12 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), cert. denied, 388 So. 2d 1119 (Fla.1980).…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw