DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
BRUNNER ENTERPRISES, INC., APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1979-09-07
No. NN-27
ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.
375 So. 2d 23 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1979) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Having considered the briefs, the record, and the oral argument presented by counsel we find this case is controlled by Stan Musial and Biggie’s, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 363 So. 2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); cert. granted, Case No. 55,711 Florida Supreme Court, and affirm.

We agree with the Fourth District Court of Appeal however that the question is one of great public interest, Roger Dean Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 371 So. 2d 101 (Fla. 4th DCA) [rehearing granted, 1 FLW 64,1979], cert. granted, Case No. 55,971 Florida Supreme Court. Therefore we certify the question to the Supreme Court: Is the gain from an out-of-state sale of stock held by a foreign corporation doing business in Florida taxable under the Florida Corporate Income Tax Code, and if so what method of computation should be used?

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, Acting C. J., and BOOTH and LARRY G. SMITH, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …gain from an out-of-state sale of stock held by a foreign corporation doing business in Florida taxable under the Florida Corporate Income Tax Code, and if so, what method of computation should be used? Department of Revenue v. Brunner Enterprises, 375 So. 2d 23, (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(3), Fla.Const. (1972). As noted by the district court of appeal, the first portion of the question, relating to the taxability of the gain, was certified to this Court in Roger Dean Enterpr…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw