ESDORN GARDNER AND ALBERTA GARDNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS HUSBAND AND WIFE, APPELLANTS,
v.
METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court reversed the dismissal of a negligence complaint against Dade County for alleged unsafe intersection design and maintenance, holding that Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County permits such claims against counties for failure to maintain public roadways.
A negligence action against a county for failure to properly maintain a public roadway states a cause of action and cannot be dismissed for lack of a special duty.
[1] A county may be held liable in negligence for failure to properly maintain a public roadway, and such a claim does not require allegations of a special duty owed to the p…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEsdorn Gardner was injured in a motor vehicle collision at an intersection in Dade County; the Gardners alleged the County negligently designed and ma…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Special Duty Doctrine cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Esdorn and Alberta Gardner appeal an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice for negligence against Dade County.
Plaintiff Esdorn Gardner was injured as the result of an intersectional collision between the truck in which he was a passenger and another motor vehicle. Mrs. Gardner and he sued Dade County basically alleging the County was negligent in the design and maintenance of the intersection making it unsafe for vehicular traffic and that the stop sign erected at the intersection was placed so low to the ground that it was not visible to motorists entering the intersection. Dade County moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a cause of action in that there were no allegations of a special duty owed to the public generally. The trial judge dismissed the amended complaint against the County with leave to amend. Plaintiffs elected to stand on the amended complaint and the trial court dismissed the amended complaint with prejudice.
While this appeal was pending, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River County, 371 So. 2d 1010 (Fla.1979) allowing negligence actions against the state and county for failure to properly maintain a public roadway. Accordingly, we hereby reverse the order dismissing plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice and remand the cause to the trial court to reconsider the motion to dismiss in light of the holding in the Commercial Carrier Corp. case.
Reversed and remanded.
KEHOE, J., dissents.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Commercial Carrier Corp. v. Indian River Cnty., 371 So. 2d 1010 (Fla. 1979)