WATKINS DRY WALL, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

DRUMMOND COURT CORPORATION, A CANADIAN CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By (85 total)

• Hervey v. Alfonso, 650 So. 2d 644 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995)
  …rs to interrogatories, and admissions, on file, together with affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. E.g., Snyder v. Cheezem Dev. Corp., 373 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). The party moving for summary judgment has the bur [*646] den of establishing irrefutably that the non-moving party cannot prevail. E.g., Gomes v. Stevens, 548 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Furthermore, it is only after the movi…
• Gomes v. Stevens, 548 So. 2d 1163 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.510(c). The burden, furthermore, is on the movant to demonstrate conclusively that the nonmoving party cannot prevail. Snyder v. Ckeezem Dev. Corp., 373 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). See also Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966). If the record reflects the existence of any genuine issue of material fact, or the possibility of any issue, or if the record raises even the slightest doubt that an issue might…
• Shaw v. Tampa Elec. Co., 949 So. 2d 1066 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007)
  …itled to judgment as a matter of law.” Reeves v. N. Broward Hosp. Dist, 821 So. 2d 319, 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). The moving party carries the heavy burden of showing conclusively that the nonmoving party cannot prevail. Snyder v. Cheezem Dev. Corp., 373 So. 2d 719, 720 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). “If the record reflects the existence of any genuine issue of material fact, or the possibility of any issue, or if the record raises even the slightest doubt that an issue might exist, summary judgment is improper.” Id. We…

Authorities Cited

• Edward L. Nezelek, Inc. v. Food Fair Props. Agency, Inc., 309 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)