SAMUEL AND DORA FISCHER, APPELLANTS,
v.
TRAFALGAR TOWERS ASSOCIATION # 2, INC., APPELLEE
SAMUEL AND DORA FISCHER, APPELLANTS,
TRAFALGAR TOWERS ASSOCIATION # 2, INC., APPELLEE
372 So. 2d 528
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1979)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the dismissal with prejudice of one count from a two-count complaint. Although judgment was entered against appellants oh the dismissed count, the other count remains pending. The two counts are based on the same factual circumstances and are inter-related. Thus, the dismissal is an interlocutory order not subject to appeal until after final judgment in the case. The appeal is hereby dismissed. Mendez v. West Flagler Family Association, Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1974); Venezia A., Inc. v. Askew, 314 So. 2d 254 (Fla.1st DCA 1975).
DAUKSCH, LETTS and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Lauda v. H. F. Mason Equip. Corp., 407 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…elated.3 Therefore, were Count V still pending in the trial court, we would unhesitatingly grant the defendant Mason’s motion to dismiss.4 S.L.T. Warehouse Company v. Webb, 304 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1974); Fischer v. Trafalgar Towers Association # 2, Inc., 372 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979); Venezia A., Inc. v. Askew, 314 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975). But Count Y has been voluntarily dismissed by the plaintiff, and there would appear to be no impediment to our reviewing the propriety of the summary judgments unles…
-
Smith v. Smith, 378 So. 2d 1309 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)…PER CURIAM. This cause is hereby dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. See Fischer v. Trafalgar Towers Association No. 2, Inc., 372 So. 2d 528 (Fla.4th DCA 1979). ANSTEAD, LETTS and BERANEK, JJ., concur.…
-
Cornelius v. Cornelius, 382 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)…977). Recent decisions, both from this district, e. g., Robinson v. Robinson, 366 So. 2d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979), and others, Fraser v. Fraser, 368 So. 2d 97 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Judge v. Judge, 370 So. 2d 833 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Saldana v. Saldana, 372 So. 2d 528 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), have followed the equation and disregarded Brown’s marital contribution rule. Since the Yandell standards remain intact it is necessary that we recede from language in Brown which suggests a lump sum award may be made without a…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Mendez v. W. Flagler Fam. Ass'n, Inc., 303 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1974)
- Venezia A., Inc. v. Reubin O'Donovan Askew, 314 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975)