SY GAER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appellant's constitutional arguments were without merit and affirmed the convictions.
An attorney was charged with violating statutes related to solicitation of legal services, aiding bail bondsmen, and conspiracy. The conspiracy charge…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constitutional Grounds cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, an attorney, was charged with violations of Florida Statutes, sections 877.-02 (solicitation of legal services), 648.44 (aiding and abetting the recommendation of counsel by a bail bondsman), and 777.04 (conspiracy). The conspiracy charge was dismissed. After his attacks on the Information were rejected on state and federal constitutional grounds, appellant’ entered pleas of nolo contendere. He reserved the right to appeal the court’s rulings on the constitutional issues. Jurisdiction vests in this court under article V, section 3(b)(1) of the Florida Constitution.
We find the appellant’s equal protection arguments to be without merit. All of the other constitutional issues raised by appellant were recently determined and fully discussed in Pace v. State, 368 So. 2d 340 (Fla.1979). We find further discussion of these issues unnecessary.
The convictions are affirmed.
It is so ordered.
ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD, OVERTON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur.