GINO BIRONI, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
SALLY HENDERSON, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Gino Bironi was sued on a promissory note while imprisoned in a Florida correctional institution. The trial court granted service by publication and entered default judgment against him, but the appellate court reversed because the plaintiff failed to make reasonable inquiry to locate the defendant for personal service.
The court reversed the default judgment, finding that the appellee failed to reasonably employ knowledge at her command and make diligent inquiry appropriate to the circumstances to effect personal service upon the appellant.
[1] Service by publication is insufficient when the plaintiff has knowledge of the defendant's whereabouts or could have discovered them through reasonable diligence.
[2] A plaintiff must demonstrate diligent inquiry to locate a defendant for personal service before resorting to service by publication.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“appellee failed to reasonably employ knowledge at her command and make diligent inquiry appropriate to the circumstances to enable her to make personal service upon appellant”
States the legal standard requiring plaintiffs to make reasonable inquiry before resorting to service by publication
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBironi was confined in a criminal correctional institution in Broward County, Florida when Sally Henderson sued him on a promissory note in Dade Count…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Service By Publication cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, Gino Bironi, Jr., was sued by appellee, Sally Henderson, upon a promissory note in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, during a time he was confined in a criminal correctional institution in Bro-ward County, Florida.
Appellee’s attorney filed an affidavit for service by publication stating that he had personal knowledge of the action; that Bironi could not be found within the state of Florida for service of the summons; and that his residence was unknown. At the same time appellee filed a renotice of action regarding the promissory note. Default was entered against appellant for failure to answer. Final judgment was later entered for Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars plus costs and attorney fees. Appellant became aware of the suit and judgment against him when he was served with a subpoena duces tecum in aid of execution. Whereupon he filed a motion to vacate the default and final judgment supported by an affidavit of appellant stating that the promissory note sued upon was given consideration of moneys paid an attorney by the appellee for appellant’s defense of criminal charges and that appellant was confined to a criminal correctional institution in Broward County, Florida.
The trial court denied the motion to vacate and this appeal followed. One of the grounds urged by appellant for reversal is that appellee failed to reasonably employ knowledge at her command and make diligent inquiry appropriate to the circumstances to enable her to make personal service upon appellant. We find merit in appellant’s contention and reverse. See Gmaz v. King, 238 So. 2d 511 (Fla.2d DCA 1970); Mayo v. Mayo, 344 So. 2d 933 (Fla.2d DCA 1977).
Reversed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gmaz v. King, 238 So. 2d 511 (Fla. 2d DCA 1970)
- Mayo v. Mayo, 344 So. 2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977)