JERMAINE T. DAVIS, APPELLANT,
v.
MICHELLE SMITH F/K/A MICHELLE HARRINGTON, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Petition For Modification cases and more on FLexlaw
GOLDENBERG, RENEE, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a final judgment on petitions for modification. We affirm except as to the modification of the visitation schedule and payment of transportation costs.
One year prior to the filing of the parties’ supplemental petitions for modification, the parties entered into their Supplemental Agreement Regarding Visitation which specifically addressed these issues, resolving earlier disputes. We find that a substantial change in circumstances warranting the modification of the parties’ Supplemental Agreement regarding the visitation schedule and payment of transportation costs has not been shown by competent substantial evidence, nor did the court’s order reflect such a finding. The parties agreed at trial only to a modification of the location for exchange of the child. Wade v. Hirschman, 903 So. 2d 928 (Fla.2005).
Affirmed in Part and Reversed in Part
GROSS, C.J. and POLEN, J., concur.