ALFREDO HIDALGO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1978-11-14
No. 78-498
Before PEARSON and HENDRY, JJ., and CHARLES CARROLL (Ret.), Associate Judge.
364 So. 2d 817 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1978) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Alfredo Hidalgo, was found guilty of aggravated battery by a jury. On this appeal, reversal is urged upon two grounds: (1) that the court erred in refusing to instruct upon a claimed lesser-included offense of culpable negligence and (2) that the court’s charge upon the defense of self-defense was improper. Our review of the record, including the accusatory pleading and the evidence before the trial court, establishes that the misdemeanor of culpable negligence was not, as contended by the appellant, a category four, lesser-included offense under the rule set forth in Brown v. State, 206 So. 2d 377 (Fla.1968). Therefore, it was not error for the court to fail to charge on the misdemeanor. Further, the record demonstrates that there was no error in the charge to the jury on the burden of proof on the defense of self-defense. See the rule of law in Mathews v. State, 221 So. 2d 431, 432 (Fla.2d DCA 1969).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • In the Interest of J. C. M. v. State, 375 So. 2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979)
    …on notice that he could also be found guilty of culpable negligence. We find that argument without merit and hold that culpable negligence is not a lesser included offense of the crime of aggravated assault as charged in this case. Hidalgo v. State, 364 So. 2d 817 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). Reversed. BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and SCHEB, J., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw